I have spent the majority of my life as a manager -- a profession whose primary responsibility is making decisions, often difficult ones. And I currently teach in graduate and undergraduate business programs. My expertise includes economics, finance, statistical analysis, quantitative analysis, and decision science, so it would be natural to think that deciding where to live next would be second nature to me.
If only that was true!
The decision about a new home and a new home town involves a combination of emotional and intellectual inputs. The location must not only be economically feasible and meet my decision criteria (the intellectual part), but it must also be a place I like and will feel comfortable living (the emotional part). As an economist, I know that both the intellectual and emotional factors can be quantified and rationally analysed. After all, liking a place and feeling comfortable living there are basically factors of what economists call "utility". Emotional satisfaction, even though it is chiefly subjective, is useful and can therefore be quantified in "utils" or units of utility.
In practice, the process is just a more complex version of the process one goes through when decided what doughnut to buy. There are a wide variety of choices available: Hostess, Entenmann's, Van de Camp, Dunkin, Winchell's, Krispy Kreme, ... as well as local mom-and-pop doughnut shops or even making them at home from scratch. When we decide which doughnut to buy we consider a whole array of factors; not just the price. Included in our buying criteria are such things as the flavour, the proximity and convenience of the point of purchase, the environment in which we will purchase and consume the doughnut, or whether complementary products like coffee are available. Many people will also consider the quality, origins, or healthiness of the ingredients used, or whether they perceive the company producing or selling the doughnuts to be socially responsible. Despite the complexity, most of us can weigh all of these factors and decide what doughnut to buy fairly readily. That's because the risk is low!
At most places you can still get a doughnut for under $5.00 so even if you make the worst possible choice, you have risked and lost only a couple of dollars and a few minutes (or hours if you tried making your own) of your life. But if you move to a new town and find it doesn't suit you, you are facing a huge expense and a significant upheaval in your life!
As a result, I have already amassed spreadsheets of data on potential locations: housing costs and availability, climate data, cost of living data, crime statistics, business and employment data, social, political, and cultural information, photographs, maps, and much more. All that data can help with the intellectual issues involved in the decision, but they are of little value in determining if I will like any particular location.
So, over the next couple of weeks I will be posting what I have learned about each location I am considering. I hope I will get feedback and comments regarding those locations and my impressions about them so I can begin assessing whether or not I will like them and feel comfortable living there.
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Saturday, December 29, 2012
House Hunting 2013
In "House Hunting 2012" I described the reasoning process that has led me to be looking for a new place to live -- not just a new home, but a new home town. This is the first phase of the decision-making process: deciding which city will become my new home.
As I mentioned in the last installment, that decision is turning out to not be as easy as I had hoped. The factors in the decision are: temperate climate, low cost of living, proximity to a major airport, and conducive to opening a dojo. Months of research have led me to the conclusion that no cities in the United States meet all four of those criteria. Those that have temperate climates lack affordable housing. Those that are most conducive to opening a new dojo are either prohibitively expensive or in blast-furnace climates. The only places that meet all four of my criteria are in Central or South America! And I can't obtain a residency visa for any of those offshore locations until I'm drawing Social Security. So, until then my search is limited to places where the heat and humidity are almost unbearable to me ...
There are 16 metropolitan areas that meet three of my four criteria. The top ten of these (in alphabetic order) are:
Not one of these locations seems ideal to me. Each has major disadvantages, but each also has some attractions and advantages for me. So my focus in the early part of 2013 will be comparing all of these areas in an effort to cull them down to no more than five -- and preferably just three -- to visit in person before making my final decision. This is where I invite reader participation!
If you are familiar with any of these areas, have suggestions or comments about them that you would like to share, please feel free to share your knowledge and impressions with me.
As I mentioned in the last installment, that decision is turning out to not be as easy as I had hoped. The factors in the decision are: temperate climate, low cost of living, proximity to a major airport, and conducive to opening a dojo. Months of research have led me to the conclusion that no cities in the United States meet all four of those criteria. Those that have temperate climates lack affordable housing. Those that are most conducive to opening a new dojo are either prohibitively expensive or in blast-furnace climates. The only places that meet all four of my criteria are in Central or South America! And I can't obtain a residency visa for any of those offshore locations until I'm drawing Social Security. So, until then my search is limited to places where the heat and humidity are almost unbearable to me ...
There are 16 metropolitan areas that meet three of my four criteria. The top ten of these (in alphabetic order) are:
- Augusta, Georgia
- Carrollton, Georgia
- Charleston, South Carolina
- Columbia, South Carolina
- Columbus, Georgia
- Dallas, Texas
- Dothan, Alabama
- Jackson, Mississippi
- Memphis, Tennessee
- San Antonio, Texas
Not one of these locations seems ideal to me. Each has major disadvantages, but each also has some attractions and advantages for me. So my focus in the early part of 2013 will be comparing all of these areas in an effort to cull them down to no more than five -- and preferably just three -- to visit in person before making my final decision. This is where I invite reader participation!
If you are familiar with any of these areas, have suggestions or comments about them that you would like to share, please feel free to share your knowledge and impressions with me.
Labels:
best places to live,
cost of living,
home town,
house hunting,
moving,
new home,
relocation
Monday, December 24, 2012
House Hunting 2012
I was laid off at the end of June and after spending the past six months looking for a new job, it has become apparent that I have exhausted the possibilities in my current area (Grant County, Indiana). I have decided that if I must leave Grant County, I will leave Indiana altogether.
Don't get me wrong, I have thoroughly enjoyed living in Indiana these past 12+ years, and in some respects I don't feel I'm leaving of my own volition. All other things being equal, I would be content to live out the rest of my days in Indiana. But all other things are NOT equal.
The cost of living, and the cost of acquiring certain things that I consider essential to a healthy and active lifestyle, is simply too high in Indiana. The cost of fresh fruits and vegetables, most of which are not produced in Indiana, is astonishingly high. The cost of heating my home in winter is growing unaffordable. Even though I love having four real seasons, I cannot afford living somewhere the furnace must be on five months out of the year! So my next stop will be somewhere with a more temperate climate, and hopefully somewhere that I can reduce my living costs and improve the quality of my diet by growing some of my own fruits and vegetables -- without drenching them in chemicals or altering their DNA!
That one consideration alone narrowed my search to what is essentially America's "Sun Belt" states: California, Arizona, southern Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida. However, I included parts of southern Utah, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and North Carolina in my research, as well. Another consideration was frequent weather extremes, like hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, or flooding. This eliminated most of Florida, Arizona, New Mexico, the Texas Panhandle, and the Gulf Coast. As soon as I factored in the cost of housing (including insurance, property taxes, and utilities costs) the scope of my search was narrowed to just EIGHT feasible states: Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, and South Carolina.
Next I focused on cities and towns. My primary considerations were:
So, please stay tuned for the next part in this series, "House Hunting 2013" in which I will start reviewing the pros and cons of each possible location and invite your suggestions on which to choose.
Don't get me wrong, I have thoroughly enjoyed living in Indiana these past 12+ years, and in some respects I don't feel I'm leaving of my own volition. All other things being equal, I would be content to live out the rest of my days in Indiana. But all other things are NOT equal.
The cost of living, and the cost of acquiring certain things that I consider essential to a healthy and active lifestyle, is simply too high in Indiana. The cost of fresh fruits and vegetables, most of which are not produced in Indiana, is astonishingly high. The cost of heating my home in winter is growing unaffordable. Even though I love having four real seasons, I cannot afford living somewhere the furnace must be on five months out of the year! So my next stop will be somewhere with a more temperate climate, and hopefully somewhere that I can reduce my living costs and improve the quality of my diet by growing some of my own fruits and vegetables -- without drenching them in chemicals or altering their DNA!
That one consideration alone narrowed my search to what is essentially America's "Sun Belt" states: California, Arizona, southern Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida. However, I included parts of southern Utah, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and North Carolina in my research, as well. Another consideration was frequent weather extremes, like hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, or flooding. This eliminated most of Florida, Arizona, New Mexico, the Texas Panhandle, and the Gulf Coast. As soon as I factored in the cost of housing (including insurance, property taxes, and utilities costs) the scope of my search was narrowed to just EIGHT feasible states: Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, and South Carolina.
Next I focused on cities and towns. My primary considerations were:
- Not more than two hours from a major airport to facilitate visits with my family
- Population to sustain a dojo (at least 100,000 within 25 mile radius)
- Cost and availability of housing and utilities
- Local cost of living factors
- Temperate climate
So, please stay tuned for the next part in this series, "House Hunting 2013" in which I will start reviewing the pros and cons of each possible location and invite your suggestions on which to choose.
Saturday, June 30, 2012
New Blog Name
You who are regular readers of this blog, ...
Oh, wait! There are no regular readers of this blog! So in all likelihood no one has noticed that I just changed its name from LenSpace to Len's Space.
When I started the blog back in 2007, LenSpace seemed like one of those cool names that concatenates two words by using a shared letter (which would be the letter S in this case, if you hadn't already figured it out). I felt very avant garde and creative doing it! It was a name that, by its very nature proclaimed what a clever and innovative fellow I am! But I was contacted in March by a company called Lenspace, Inc. and asked to change the name to avoid confusing search engines. No threats were made. In fact they were extremely polite and even admitted that they had no legal basis to force me to change. Nevertheless, I knuckled under like the wuss I am!
Why?
Well, it really boils down to three things, none of which have anything to do with my wusshood. Or wussliness. Or whatever the correct term for it is. (1) It was easy to do, (2) I had only written a handful of posts in the five years I've had the blog, so it wasn't a major part of my life being affected, (3) according to the site statistics no one is reading my blog anyway, and (4) ... and this one is actually the most important of the four reasons ... it supports entrepreneurship and free enterprise!
The guy running lenspace.com has had the courage and determination to start a little business on the Web and try to make a go of it. I teach business, management, and entrepreneurship for a living, and I do it because I believe in it; not just for the paycheck. So it was another chance for me to put my money where my mouth is and do just a little something that might help somebody get their business off the ground -- a little something that literally cost me nothing but a couple of minutes to make the changes to the blog settings. A guy has an idea for a business and all I had to do was get out of his way ... seems like the least I could do!
And, if you know me, then you already know that I always do the least I can do!
Oh, wait! There are no regular readers of this blog! So in all likelihood no one has noticed that I just changed its name from LenSpace to Len's Space.
When I started the blog back in 2007, LenSpace seemed like one of those cool names that concatenates two words by using a shared letter (which would be the letter S in this case, if you hadn't already figured it out). I felt very avant garde and creative doing it! It was a name that, by its very nature proclaimed what a clever and innovative fellow I am! But I was contacted in March by a company called Lenspace, Inc. and asked to change the name to avoid confusing search engines. No threats were made. In fact they were extremely polite and even admitted that they had no legal basis to force me to change. Nevertheless, I knuckled under like the wuss I am!
Why?
Well, it really boils down to three things, none of which have anything to do with my wusshood. Or wussliness. Or whatever the correct term for it is. (1) It was easy to do, (2) I had only written a handful of posts in the five years I've had the blog, so it wasn't a major part of my life being affected, (3) according to the site statistics no one is reading my blog anyway, and (4) ... and this one is actually the most important of the four reasons ... it supports entrepreneurship and free enterprise!
The guy running lenspace.com has had the courage and determination to start a little business on the Web and try to make a go of it. I teach business, management, and entrepreneurship for a living, and I do it because I believe in it; not just for the paycheck. So it was another chance for me to put my money where my mouth is and do just a little something that might help somebody get their business off the ground -- a little something that literally cost me nothing but a couple of minutes to make the changes to the blog settings. A guy has an idea for a business and all I had to do was get out of his way ... seems like the least I could do!
And, if you know me, then you already know that I always do the least I can do!
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Halloween or Harvest Day?

I was passing out candy to trick-or-treaters last night and up to my usual "pranks" -- trying to identify the kids I know under their costumes, complimenting the wee ones on their costumes, withholding treats until they said the "magic words" ("Trick or treat!") instead of "ain't you handing out candy, mister?", and similar nonsense. I always finish by saying "Have a happy Halloween and be safe tonight." One teenager corrected me with a shout of "No, it's Harvest Day!" as he ran off.
Oh, ... really?
Since I'm a Christian, I fully understand the reticence of many Christians to celebrate what they perceive to be a pagan holiday or pagan traditions. I understand and support that idea. Many churches now sponsor harvest festivals on October 31st, and many people throw harvest parties in their homes on that day or the nearest weekend. Wonderful! If you want to take a stand against the unwholesome practices some follow on Halloween, I'm all for it. Just be consistent!
This teenager stood on my porch in jeans and a black hoodie wearing a ghost-face mask from the Scream movies and cheerfully yelled "Trick or treat!" in order to induce me to give him a handful of candy. When did wearing the mask of a fictional mass-murderer and threatening people with tricks if they did not produce treats become a Christian "harvest festival" tradition? I must have nodded off for a moment when that one was announced in church! If you're taking a stand against Halloween, fine. Then don't go trick-or-treating, you hypocrite! Stand on my porch and tell me I shouldn't be handing out candy in support of a "pagan" tradition, if you have the courage, but don't take my candy, run away, and shout back over your shoulder that it's "Harvest Day", you sniveling coward!
And, just what is "Harvest Day", anyway? I visited a number of websites describing October 31 "Harvest Day" or "Harvest Festival" and they all agreed on three core matters: (1) it is an alternative to pagan harvest festivals, (2) it celebrates the end of summer and the final harvest of the year, and (3) it is an opportunity for Christian evangelism. Wait a minute! That's exactly what Halloween is supposed to be!
For longer than history has been able to record, people around the world have celebrated the end of summer and the collection of the final harvest, as well as the observance of the beginning of the "dead" period of the year when crops cannot be grown. In ancient Rome this was the festival of Pomona. In Celtic lands it was Samhain. In the Holy Land it was Sukkot. As Christianity spread across Europe people blended their new Christian beliefs into these formerly pagan festivals, so that by the end of the 7th century Hallowmas (aka All Saints Day) had become their Christian alternative. The November 1st feast day was established formally in the Catholic church by Pope Gregory III sometime between 731 and 741 AD. Social, cultural, and political shifts throughout the Middle Ages altered the ways in which Hallowmas was observed in different areas over the centuries, and the practice of playing various relatively harmless pranks on All Hallows Eve appears to have become widespread sometime in the 16th century. It is generally thought that this mischief symbolizes the sinful nature of man that dies at midnight on All Hallows Eve and is reborn as a forgiven Christian on All Saints Day.
I wouldn't disagree that the modern practices of Halloween -- the costumes, parties, and trick-or-treating -- have commercialized the holiday and stripped it of much of its religious symbolism and meaning. But the same is true of Easter and Christmas! Should Christians cease celebrating these holidays, as well?
Most major "Christian" holidays were, in effect, superimposed over pagan festivals. Our celebration of Christ's resurrection was superimposed onto Easter -- the pagan rites of spring. Our celebration of the birth of Christ (which more likely occurred in late summer) was superimposed over pagan winter festivals. And All Saints Day and All Hallows Eve were superimposed over pagan harvest festivals. So which is the best approach for Christians to take: to abandon those holidays completely to pagan and secular celebrations, or to celebrate them in a manner that is consistent with our faith -- as we have done for the past 2,000+ years -- as a means of sharing God's love with people in desperate need of it?
I don't claim to know the "right" answer yet. But it seems to me that to celebrate October 31st as just a "harvest day" is no different from celebrating Samhain, which was also just a harvest festival. And if we want to give thanks to God for the harvest, we already have a day for that: it's called Thanksgiving Day. I also think that if we abandon Halloween entirely to its commercial, secular, and pagan revelries and refuse to celebrate its Christian origins and symbolism then along with it we are abandoning its celebrants entirely to commercialism, secularism, and paganism, as well.
Labels:
halloween,
harvest day,
harvest festival,
paganism,
trick or treat
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Voices from the Past
Last year my daughter was given a “politically correct” school assignment to research her ancestry and determine who her immigrant ancestors were. The assignment was intended to show that all Americans were immigrants – some have simply immigrated more recently – and less legally – than others. The assignment backfired when she learned that only two of her ancestors were immigrants. The rest had been living on American soil before the U.S. was founded! Dozens of her ancestors were among those who created a new and radically different nation out of a hostile wilderness and established the principles by which it would quickly rise to become the greatest nation on earth.
Since I was the one in possession of the family Bibles and other ancestral records, it fell to me to help her with the research for this project. What started out as a simple task of assembling a list of names and dates of birth and death quickly spiraled out of control. We soon realized there were numerous gaps in the records in my possession, and that the records for several branches of our family ended prior to identifying their immigrant ancestor. So we had to start digging deeper.
We discovered that, prior to about 1850, there were few government agencies or offices keeping birth, marriage, and death records. Instead, the primary repositories for these records were local churches. Fortunately, as city governments began taking responsibility for maintaining these records in the mid- to late 19th century, churches provided copies of their records to the local town clerks. These clerks often compiled those records into local histories that were published in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. And what most would find mundane reading became life-changing for me.
It began when I read a few sentences in The History of Pittsford Vermont concerning Stephen Jenner, one of my ancestors who fought briefly in the Revolutionary War. Stephen and his wife, Mary, moved to Pittsford in 1772 following their marriage. On July 7, 1775 they had their first child, my great-great-great-great-grandfather, Timothy. On Timothy’s second birthday 1,000 soldiers from Gen. John Burgoyne’s army attacked the nearby town of Hubbardton, killing some 300 men, women, and children. Those not killed were forced to flea, some bringing the news of the attack to Pittsford, where the townspeople could hear the sounds of gunfire from the battle. Fearing a similar fate, the people of Pittsford buried their belongings, so the British could not make use of them. While others prepared to defend the town, because Mary was four months pregnant with their second son, Stephen helped her mount their only horse, placed the infant Timothy in her arms, then led them out of town under the cover of night.
Tears welled up in my eyes the first time I read this account and imagined the scene of a 28 year-old father, having buried everything they could not carry, placing his pregnant young wife and 2-year-old son on a horse, then stealing through the darkness, leaving their home and nearly all possessions to an unknown fate while silently praying they did not run into any British scouts who might be patrolling the roads that night.
For the first time in my life I truly began to understand the miracle of the American Revolution and the sacrifices my own ancestors had made to create this country. It was no longer just a list of names, places, and dates in a dusty history book. It had become personal, because it was the story of my own family.
For several months now, the leisure time I would normally spend reading a Tom Clancy novel has instead been devoted to reading about the lives of my own ancestors in The History of Ancient Woodbury and similar tomes. And it has been as fascinating as any adventure story. I’ve read of Civil War battles, the War of 1812, the French & Indian War, the Pequot War, and King Philip’s War, of men and women conquering the dangers of the wilderness to build their homes and lives, of the struggle for the abolition of slavery and the institution of women’s voting rights. I’ve read the actual charters of new townships, deeds for purchase of land from indigenous tribes, records of church and town meetings, and letters and diaries expressing the hopes, fears, and ideals of those who risked their lives and fortunes to create the United States of America.
And it has left me with an overwhelming sense of shame!
We are a lazy, depraved, and ungrateful generation who do not deserve the great gift that has been given to us. Perhaps because we did not put a single drop of our own sweat or blood into obtaining our freedoms, we treat them with disregard. We have abandoned most of the principles, morals, and personal disciplines that made the U.S. once the greatest nation on earth. We have distorted, confused, and abused those principles, morals, and disciplines for political or financial gain, or to assuage our guilt at violating them. And by doing so, we have desecrated the masterpiece my ancestors created.
The voices of my ancestors now cry out from the past. They cry out from the pages of those local histories, letters, deeds, and wills. They demand to know how long I will sit back and allow my own countrymen to despoil what they worked so hard to create. They cry out to me to do something to reverse our country’s deterioration before it’s too late to salvage my heritage. And the pain and despair in their voices has made the political and social climate of this country intensely personal for me.
I only hope their voices reached me in time … their voices have certainly determined how I will vote next week!
Since I was the one in possession of the family Bibles and other ancestral records, it fell to me to help her with the research for this project. What started out as a simple task of assembling a list of names and dates of birth and death quickly spiraled out of control. We soon realized there were numerous gaps in the records in my possession, and that the records for several branches of our family ended prior to identifying their immigrant ancestor. So we had to start digging deeper.
We discovered that, prior to about 1850, there were few government agencies or offices keeping birth, marriage, and death records. Instead, the primary repositories for these records were local churches. Fortunately, as city governments began taking responsibility for maintaining these records in the mid- to late 19th century, churches provided copies of their records to the local town clerks. These clerks often compiled those records into local histories that were published in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. And what most would find mundane reading became life-changing for me.
It began when I read a few sentences in The History of Pittsford Vermont concerning Stephen Jenner, one of my ancestors who fought briefly in the Revolutionary War. Stephen and his wife, Mary, moved to Pittsford in 1772 following their marriage. On July 7, 1775 they had their first child, my great-great-great-great-grandfather, Timothy. On Timothy’s second birthday 1,000 soldiers from Gen. John Burgoyne’s army attacked the nearby town of Hubbardton, killing some 300 men, women, and children. Those not killed were forced to flea, some bringing the news of the attack to Pittsford, where the townspeople could hear the sounds of gunfire from the battle. Fearing a similar fate, the people of Pittsford buried their belongings, so the British could not make use of them. While others prepared to defend the town, because Mary was four months pregnant with their second son, Stephen helped her mount their only horse, placed the infant Timothy in her arms, then led them out of town under the cover of night.
Tears welled up in my eyes the first time I read this account and imagined the scene of a 28 year-old father, having buried everything they could not carry, placing his pregnant young wife and 2-year-old son on a horse, then stealing through the darkness, leaving their home and nearly all possessions to an unknown fate while silently praying they did not run into any British scouts who might be patrolling the roads that night.
For the first time in my life I truly began to understand the miracle of the American Revolution and the sacrifices my own ancestors had made to create this country. It was no longer just a list of names, places, and dates in a dusty history book. It had become personal, because it was the story of my own family.
For several months now, the leisure time I would normally spend reading a Tom Clancy novel has instead been devoted to reading about the lives of my own ancestors in The History of Ancient Woodbury and similar tomes. And it has been as fascinating as any adventure story. I’ve read of Civil War battles, the War of 1812, the French & Indian War, the Pequot War, and King Philip’s War, of men and women conquering the dangers of the wilderness to build their homes and lives, of the struggle for the abolition of slavery and the institution of women’s voting rights. I’ve read the actual charters of new townships, deeds for purchase of land from indigenous tribes, records of church and town meetings, and letters and diaries expressing the hopes, fears, and ideals of those who risked their lives and fortunes to create the United States of America.
And it has left me with an overwhelming sense of shame!
We are a lazy, depraved, and ungrateful generation who do not deserve the great gift that has been given to us. Perhaps because we did not put a single drop of our own sweat or blood into obtaining our freedoms, we treat them with disregard. We have abandoned most of the principles, morals, and personal disciplines that made the U.S. once the greatest nation on earth. We have distorted, confused, and abused those principles, morals, and disciplines for political or financial gain, or to assuage our guilt at violating them. And by doing so, we have desecrated the masterpiece my ancestors created.
The voices of my ancestors now cry out from the past. They cry out from the pages of those local histories, letters, deeds, and wills. They demand to know how long I will sit back and allow my own countrymen to despoil what they worked so hard to create. They cry out to me to do something to reverse our country’s deterioration before it’s too late to salvage my heritage. And the pain and despair in their voices has made the political and social climate of this country intensely personal for me.
I only hope their voices reached me in time … their voices have certainly determined how I will vote next week!
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
The Carbon Credit Scam
Did you miss your opportunity to help the Prince of Nigeria transfer his millions of dollars in frozen assets to safety? Well, don't worry, Al Gore has given you another chance to be duped! Thanks to the miracle of carbon credits, even nobodies like you and I can help the Prince of America save the planet from global warming.
Here's how the scheme works: if you're an obscenely wealthy, planet-raping oppresser of the little people (like Prince of America, Al Gore), you can ride around in the luxury of private jets all day long -- belching out more pollutants in a single day than the average American produces in a lifetime -- and not only assuage your own guilty conscience, but also bamboozle the simple-minded into believing that you're actually "acting green" ... just by buying carbon credits! But wait, it gets even better. By paying a few extra dollars to erase your "carbon footprint" you can cast aspersions at anyone who isn't rich enough to do the same, thereby shaming them into using less fossil-fuels so there will be more for you and your fat-cat Hollywood friends!
You see, a carbon credit is nothing more than paying a fee to someone who owns a tree in return for credit for the amount of carbon dioxide that tree removes from the atmosphere. Oh sure, that tree was there anyway, and it was going to process that carbon dioxide anyway, and they're not going to plant a single additional tree just because some rich polluter pays them an arbitrary fee for the credit. But actually cleaning the air isn't the point. The point is to feel good about yourself -- smug, self-righteous, and condescending toward anyone who doesn't buy carbon credits -- and to be environmentally holier-than-thou toward ordinary people.
And it gets even better. Since they don't use the money from carbon credits to actually clean one cubic inch of air or to plant more trees, there is a limited supply of carbon credits available in the world. Once the elitists like Al Gore have bought them all up, they will be able to justify legislating away the rights of ordinary people to use fossil-fuels in the name of environmental preservation. Oh, happy day for the planet! Then only the wealthy elite -- who are, because of their wealth and privilege, obviously wiser and more deserving than all the rest of us, anyway -- will be able to play on their private jets and yachts and vast estates to their hearts' content without any fear that mere undeserving peasants like us might emit even a speck of greenhouse gas trying not to freeze to death in the winter. No, they will keep us firmly crushed under the iron heels of their jackboots where we belong!
Heil, Gore, savior of the planet! Sieg, heil!
NOTE: As always, the opinions expressed in this blog do not necessarily represent the opinions of my sponsors.
Here's how the scheme works: if you're an obscenely wealthy, planet-raping oppresser of the little people (like Prince of America, Al Gore), you can ride around in the luxury of private jets all day long -- belching out more pollutants in a single day than the average American produces in a lifetime -- and not only assuage your own guilty conscience, but also bamboozle the simple-minded into believing that you're actually "acting green" ... just by buying carbon credits! But wait, it gets even better. By paying a few extra dollars to erase your "carbon footprint" you can cast aspersions at anyone who isn't rich enough to do the same, thereby shaming them into using less fossil-fuels so there will be more for you and your fat-cat Hollywood friends!
You see, a carbon credit is nothing more than paying a fee to someone who owns a tree in return for credit for the amount of carbon dioxide that tree removes from the atmosphere. Oh sure, that tree was there anyway, and it was going to process that carbon dioxide anyway, and they're not going to plant a single additional tree just because some rich polluter pays them an arbitrary fee for the credit. But actually cleaning the air isn't the point. The point is to feel good about yourself -- smug, self-righteous, and condescending toward anyone who doesn't buy carbon credits -- and to be environmentally holier-than-thou toward ordinary people.
And it gets even better. Since they don't use the money from carbon credits to actually clean one cubic inch of air or to plant more trees, there is a limited supply of carbon credits available in the world. Once the elitists like Al Gore have bought them all up, they will be able to justify legislating away the rights of ordinary people to use fossil-fuels in the name of environmental preservation. Oh, happy day for the planet! Then only the wealthy elite -- who are, because of their wealth and privilege, obviously wiser and more deserving than all the rest of us, anyway -- will be able to play on their private jets and yachts and vast estates to their hearts' content without any fear that mere undeserving peasants like us might emit even a speck of greenhouse gas trying not to freeze to death in the winter. No, they will keep us firmly crushed under the iron heels of their jackboots where we belong!
Heil, Gore, savior of the planet! Sieg, heil!
NOTE: As always, the opinions expressed in this blog do not necessarily represent the opinions of my sponsors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)